Do youn agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do youn agree or disagree with the following statement?
It’s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Is it true for the government to fund space travel and space exploration? When it comes to the question, the answer differs from individual to individual. Some are adamant that it is worth funding the space travel and exploration, while others hold squarely the oppostie statement. Both statements are convincing and stand on points, yet my experience and real-life example lead me to conclude that it wastes to fund the space travel and exploration. More reasons and examples will be shed light on as follows.
To begin with, the government should focus on the consequence of funding, while space travel or space exploration are hard to have result. For example, when the government invest on the project or the plan, it is essential for them to require the consequence because the fund is came form the citezens. To be more specific, the government should be responsible for their citizens, so they can’t fund the project which seems to get the importance result difficultly. It is widely acknowledged that space travel or space exploration aren’t easy to breakthrough the adversity and discover new substantial knowledge. Thus, it’s a waste of money to fund space travel or space exploration.
In addition, it is pivotal for the government to concentrate on their poeople’s quality of life, yet space travel or space exploration aren’t beneficial for people. For instance, air pollution and traffic congestion are serious issue in the city, and both are more imperation for the government to manage. It is because that both issues not only harm people’s health and influence their life. On the contrary, space travel only satisfies people’s curiosity of outer space, and space exploration matches with the curiosity of scientists and astrounants . None of them will improve people ‘s quality of life. Therefore, funding space travel or space exploration wastes money.
Lastly, the government must to ensure the country’s safety, but space travel or space exploration can’t enhance the defensive capacity. Take Taiwan as an example, it is a place that are seen as the dangerous region internationally, because the major rivary has many actions to threaten Taiwan. That is to say, they should reinforce the military power to protect Taiwan. In contrast, space travel and space exploration haven’t any function of defending Taiwan. Hence, both funding are waste.
In conclusion, funding space travel and exploration is wasting. It is because that the government should look to the quality of people's life, the consequence of the project and safety of the country .

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ire the consequence because the fund is came form the citezens. To be more specific,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... curiosity of scientists and astrounants . None of them will improve people ‘s qua...
^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...n wastes money. Lastly, the government must to ensure the country’s safety, but space ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of the project and safety of the country .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.0752688172 433% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25362318841 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88847398178 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8836750696 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5652173913 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47826086957 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429411782612 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155907601308 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131619162458 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270384254538 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735020385923 0.0645574589148 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.