Foreign visitors should pay more money than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
There is certainly no shadow of doubt that every nation is proud of its historical values created over long period of time. Therefore, they create cultural and historical attractions to make their merits known to the world and attract other nations’ attention. However, the question is whether such kind of attractions should be of the same cost for both local people and visitors? Though there are various ideas and perceptions over this topic, I am definitely of the opinion that all cultural and historical attractions should be available and affordable for anyone, regardless the nationality and status. I will explore the most discernible reasons for my viewpoint in the subsequent body paragraphs.
To commence with, higher price of historical attractions will discourage a lot of tourists from visiting that country. It goes without saying that visitors first consider the total cost that will back on them from visiting a particular country and strive to find affordable ways. Consequently, as one of the main goals of visiting a country is to be introduced to its historical and cultural merits, the high prices of such attractions will not be very appealing to them. This, in turn, will lead to the decrease in the number of tourists, which will indubitably cause a great harm to the country’s budget.
In addition, we can simply imply that high prices of these attractions, that are not alluring to the tourists, will do a lot of harm to the country, by making it little known to the world. In other words, the less tourists are visiting a particular country, the less it is exposed and known to the world. My country is a compelling example of this. Though Armenia includes a tiny area in the frame of the whole world, it is well known worldwide with its history and culture. This is mainly because of the fact that every year the number of tourists is increasing at an exponential rate. Due to the facts that Armenia is endowed with immense historical and cultural legacy and provides affordable museums, guides and historical attractions it is a very desirable place to visit. In this way, my country gives its tourist the opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I can surely declare that increasing the costs of historical attractions will be of no benefit for any country and will bring a lot of problems to it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | ChristineSmb | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree: students are more influenced by their teachers than by theri friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 76
- "When people succeed in life, it is because of hard work. Being lucky has nothing to do with success in life." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 66
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 70
- Life today is easier and comfortable then it was when your grandparents were children. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...its historical values created over long period of time. Therefore, they create cultural and hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to the tourists, will do a lot of harm to the country, by making it little know...
^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun tourists is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...known to the world. In other words, the less tourists are visiting a particular coun...
^^^^
Line 9, column 492, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...its history and culture. This is mainly because of the fact that every year the number of tourists is in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, so, therefore, well, in addition, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79032733169 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2757793282 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.764705882 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147025524647 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476626987601 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531316809712 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918843040851 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610163173051 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.