Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
Language is one of the most important ingredients of nations’ cultures. However; unfortunately, with the passage of time a number of languages has already disappeared and died out from the world. Though this ostensibly seems to be beneficial for facilitating the process of communication and globalization, I am of the conviction that the disappearance of languages can precipitate a lot of deleterious effects. I will explore the most discernible reasons for my viewpoint in the subsequent body paragraphs.
To commence with, language loss definitely ruins the cultural and national unity of the country, where the language is spoken. Indubitably, people perceive and understand their traditions, customs and habits in their own language. In other words, the ceremonies, rituals and events that the culture of a particular country integrates, are all held and implemented in the country’s national language. To elucidate my point, let us take the example of Armenian diaspora. People who has created this huge diaspora are considered to be Armenians, but the main problem is they do not speak their own language very often and usually, are not familiar and able to understand their national traditions.
In addition, if the languages keep disappearing on this rate, the globalization of cultures will be inevitable. Though many people stick to the idea that this will do solely good to humanity, I will claim that the fusion of cultures will eventually cause their disappearance. Take the same example mentioned above. Armenians living abroad and speaking foreign languages are hugely exposed to this globalization process. For example, in the USA a lot of Armenians celebrate the Halloween, instead of maintaining their national values and traditions. To my opinion, this is the very result of speaking a foreign language, as they gradually start to think in the way that indigenous people think.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I will surely state that the language loss cannot have any advantageous effects on the society, but will certainly set the stage for globalization of cultures and and loss of national identity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | ChristineSmb | 70 | view |
| 2017-09-16 | yeu192 | 76 | view |
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? 80
- "When people succeed in life, it is because of hard work. Being lucky has nothing to do with success in life." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 66
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT SCIENTISTS MAKE THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIETY. OTHERS THINK THAT THE CONTRIBUTIONS FOF ARTISTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT. 76
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 70
- Foreign visitors should pay more money than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... ingredients of nations' cultures. However; unfortunately, with the passage of tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...the stage for globalization of cultures and and loss of national identity.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.401179941 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15807577898 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4390149173 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4375 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268006379821 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867335298495 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645775383966 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16166275164 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584689145319 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.