friendship
Nowadays in the hustle-bustle modern world, people need to have friends. Although some people prefer to have many friends and make many relationships to have fun, I believe that it is better to have selective ones with deep connection. I have this feeling because of two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, because of the complicated today’s life situation, it can be so helpful to have a great friend to rely on her in hard times. Everybody passes through hard conditions in her life; having a good friend can be so relieving in these experiences. Sometimes people need to vocalizing their issue to someone, who was not a family member and have known each other for a long time. For example, when I have some problem with my marriage life, I really need to talk to someone, On the other hand, I do not like to talk to my mother and make her worry, so, I prefer to speak with my close friend, who has known me very well and do not always lesson to me. Besides, I do the same thing for her too.
Second, close friends not only can help each other in hard times but also they can have memorable times with each other. I feel it is so much more fun to hang out with people who you actually care about them and know them, because close friends have so many things in common, and they have known each other very well, and more important, people are so comfortable in front of their close friends, and they do not worry that they may judge them. In contrast, people should be very polite and formal in front of strangers or new friends, that I think this will decrease the fun very much. As a result, I prefer to be myself and far from the socials conventions, when I am hanging out with my friends.
To sum up, I totally agree with this Idea that the ability to maintain close friends is much more important of the ability to make many new friends because close friends have known each other very well and they can help each other in hardships. Besides, it is more fun to hang out with people that really know you and do not judge you, far from social conventions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | amchoi0810 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | TOEFLkiller | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | TOEFLkiller | 76 | view |
- It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. 66
- do you agree or disagree with this statement. today's young people do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- about Agnostids 73
- televesion 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to vocalize'?
Suggestion: need to vocalize
... in these experiences. Sometimes people need to vocalizing their issue to someone, who was not a f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...le who you actually care about them and know them, because close friends have so man...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, well, for example, i feel, i think, in contrast, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38874680307 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3074837231 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457800511509 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7822134643 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9285714286 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.45110844103 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.