TED nets
The main topic of both lecture and passage is about turtle sea which is in dangered by shrimp nets. And a new invented net, named TED, is planned to prevent this danger. The passage claims that TED has several problems and it is better not to be used. The professor on the other hand, completely denies whatever mentioned in the passage through citing several reasons.
First, both passage and lecture talks about some shrimpers argue that turtle gets trapped so rare. According to the passage, using TEDs cost shrimopers to lose some of their shrimps. And shrimper may just once a month catch a turtle, so it does not worth it that they use it. However, the professor refutes this, stating that it is true that it is a rare accident, but imagine how much shrimpers are in the seas. So every month, thousands of turtles trapped and die eventually. As a result, it is a severe danger for turtles and hunters should use TEDs.
Secondly, both the author and the professor discuss alternative methods of protection of sea turtles. And the author argues that in one of these methods, shrimpers can make the time that they allow to keep the nest underwater shorter. And bring the nest up and allow if any turtle exists in it breathe. In contrast, the professor points out that this theory is not possible in reality and shrimpers can not control the time every single time they go for hunting.
Lastly, both the reading and lecture address the subject of TED effectiveness for larger species of endangered sea turtles. The passage goes on to mention that it is not sufficient because some large species can not fit through the escape from the nest even the nest would be TED. Nevertheless, the professor supports a contradictory view as compared to that of the passage; he describes that it is true these are too small for some species, but TEDs can be made larger. When the larger ones are produced, it is not a problem anymore.
- People in society work in many different settings, and for a variety of reasons. What do you think is the main reason why people have jobs?• to feel happier about their lives • to save money for the future • to develop new skills 70
- do you agree or disagree with this statement. today's young people do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- summarize the point of view of the passage and the lecture 81
- People in society work in many different settings, and for a variety of reasons. What do you think is the main reason why people have jobs?• to feel happier about their lives • to save money for the future • to develop new skills 70
- sports 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... it is a rare accident, but imagine how much shrimpers are in the seas. So every mon...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and hunters should use TEDs. Secondly, both the author and the professor discus...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...mpers can make the time that they allow to keep the nest underwater shorter. And bring ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68529411765 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44429106768 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8205316449 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7058823529 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162149551942 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549551456176 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092284964808 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09815657747 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829453406114 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.