Government always fund many fields. It support education and health. Therefore, government should spend money in very paramount things. Whether, the government should provid its support to arts or to athletcs as state-sponsored teams, this can be weighed in many aspects.
Admittedly, some people believe that funding arts is more important than sports, this is because, they think that arts is a type of entertaintment and decrease stress of person. In my perseptive, I do not concur with the statement, that government should spend money to support atrs more than in support athletics. I believe, funding to sports like state-sponsored olympic team is crucial thing. In the following essay, I will elaborate on a couple reasons to explain my point of view.
First, and foremost, funding olymic teams has benefits for team'country and to the teams members. This mainly because, when the team win with gold or silver rewared, the reputation will be for the country and to the players. For instance, each four years, there is olympic competetion among teams from many countries. Barasil always win the compettetion, so this will help people to know more about this country and encourage them to visit it. hence, economy of that country will improve. As we can see the importance of support athletices and sports.
Second reason springs to my mind. olympice sports need a lot of prepration, like many equipments and -spesific place for each type. In addition to training of players. Furthermore, when country selected to be the place where all other teams play on it ground, this will need a suitible arrangement to occupy these many people. Moreover, many audiounces will be excited to travel and attend to see all type of sports and encourage their teams. All these things need funding from government more than arts.
To sum up, the statement is not as persuasive as it stands, this is based on exposition which are mention above. funding sports is important to mreputation of country. Furthermore sports need more equipments and prepration more than arts.
Government always fund many fields. It support education and health. Therefore, government should spend money in very paramount things. Whether, the government should provid its support to arts or to athletcs as state-sponsored teams, this can be weighed in many aspects.
Admittedly, some people believe that funding arts is more important than sports, this is because, they think that arts is a type of entertaintment and decrease stress of person. In my perseptive, I do not concur with the statement, that government should spend money to support atrs more than in support athletics. I believe, funding to sports like state-sponsored olympic team is crucial thing. In the following essay, I will elaborate on a couple reasons to explain my point of view.
First, and foremost, funding olymic teams has benefits for team'country and to the teams members. This mainly because, when the team win with gold or silver rewared, the reputation will be for the country and to the players. For instance, each four years, there is olympic competetion among teams from many countries. Barasil always win the competetion, so this will help people to know more about this country and encourage them to visit it. hence, economy of that country will improve. As we can see the importance of support athetices and sports.
Second reason springs to my mind. olymbic sports need a lot of prepration, like many equipments and -spesific place for each type. In addition to training of players. Furthermore, when country selected to be the place where all other teams play on it ground, this will need a suitible arrangement to occupy these many people. Moreover, many audiounces will be excited to travel and attend to see all type of sports and encourage their teams. All these things need funding from government more than arts.
To sum up, the statement is not as persuasive as it stands, this is based on exposition which are mention above. funding sports is important to mreputation of country. Furthermore sports need more equipments and prepration more than arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-23 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The readind passage and lecture are both about whether dinosaurs wa s endothermal reptiles or not The writers claims three evidences that dinosaurs were enotherms The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions all evidence which are mentio 65
- The reading passage and lecture about buzzing which is a type of advertising of priducts Writer of the passage points that buzzing shuold be banned The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says critics about buzzing are missleading First Autho 83
- Peoples today are interested with getting a huge amount of information to learn acrucial skills to obtain a perfect live some people believe reading book is a good method to gain information other believe watching electric device is better to getting info 66
- Anyone in this life may makes mistake accidently but whether we should correct this mistake when we hear it directly or waiting later This can be weighed in many aspects Although some people prefer to correct their teacher or meeting leader mistake right 60
- Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called burning mirror by Creek to defense themselves from Roman navy The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says it just myth However the lecturer has another opi 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supports'?
Suggestion: supports
Government always fund many fields. It support education and health. Therefore, govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., this can be weighed in many aspects. Admittedly, some people believe that fun...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons to explain my point of view. First, and foremost, funding olymic tea...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance of support athetices and sports. Second reason springs to my mind. olymbi...
^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Olymbic
.... Second reason springs to my mind. olymbic sports need a lot of prepration, like m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... encourage their teams. All these things need funding from government more than a...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unding from government more than arts. To sum up, the statement is not as persu...
^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Funding
... on exposition which are mention above. funding sports is important to mreputation of c...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...is important to mreputation of country. Furthermore sports need more equipments and preprat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09467455621 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.756685283 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523668639053 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0044029173 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8695652174 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6956521739 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407250148124 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11648152619 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14220018569 0.0737576698707 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261175891111 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271389283047 0.0645574589148 420% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.