has technology made the world a better place to live?
No one can deny that technology has changed the way of human being's life and no one can overlook that it has brought numerous advantages which provide us with a better life. Thousands years ago mankind would not even imagine that someday they could walk on the moon or travel the world in just some hours. Who would even think that the ones who lived in the cave once became the ones who bring the world to his knees. Most people share a common view in which technology plays an important role in our life. On the contrary, many others strongly subscribe to the idea that technology has a dark side as well. I strongly believe that for every advantage that technology brings us, it also brings us a disadvantage at the same time.
In the modern world, without any doubt one of the biggest challenges of humanity is to have better life.
Technology offers us many equipment and tools in many fields each of which has been created in order to meet our needs ranging from basic human needs to the top. It seems to me that human needs show the way of the technology advancement. Accordingly, with the advent of technology human can achieve a better life.
Technology is turning us into a zombie. Nowadays people have started to realize the fact that each technology has a dark side as well. For instance consider mobiles and smart gadgets. It is impossible to ignore that mobile is one of the best inventions of human beings. Not only you can communicate with others but also you can read a book, watch a movie, surf the Internet and so forth. On the contrary, it also has a serious disadvantage in which it brings distractions to life and makes you to forget about your goals. Zombies are everywhere on the Earth. You can see zombies while they are passing across the street with a mobile on their palm or you can see zombies in restaurant while they are seating at the bar, eating a meal by themselves, with a mobile in their hands. Technology makes it easy to be in a room full of people, but really alone to ourselves.
There have been a large number of studies into effects of technology on human body. Scientists have proven that our ancestors' body were partially more powerful than we are now. I stick to the idea that lack of technology cause people to depend on themselves in order to satisfy their needs. For example, they had to wash their clothes on the river instead of using washing machine. Besides, they needed to consume more energy to finish the jobs. Although they had more difficult life than we have today, their bodies were more efficient.
When taking into account all these merits and demerits we may safely arrive at the conclusion that technology advantages outnumber any disadvantages. Nevertheless, merits of technology are strongly depends on the way of using it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...technology has changed the way of human beings life and no one can overlook that it ha...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or travel the world in just some hours. Who would even think that the ones who live...
^^^
Line 8, column 17, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... alone to ourselves. There have been a large number of studies into effects of technology on h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, well, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65322580645 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47962561371 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495967741935 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0308522992 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4814814815 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3703703704 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175676802531 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492290621266 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445774911562 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992821527982 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460923195098 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.