High school teachers (teachers of age 14-18) spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take note. Other high school teachers spend mmost of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involed in and exchange their ideas.
Without a shadow of doubt education plays a pivotal role in the lives of young people. Professions in the education system invariably are in the search of the best way of this process to enhance the progress of students. The controversial question which arises here is that it is better for students in the age of 14 to 18 to merely listen carefully and take notes or be involved in the discussion with their teacher. I believe that their teacher should involve students in the discussion. In what follows, I will aptly elaborate on my perspective.
The first remarkable point to be mentioned is that the pupils learn the content of the class in high quality if they discuss with the teacher and their classmates associated with that lesson. In addition, by this approach they will not forget those ideas easily, so it will effect their final grades profoundly and they achieve excellent grades at the end of the educational year. My own experience is a compelling example for this. When I was in second grade of high school, I have always gotten involved in different subjects which culminated in becoming the best student of the class. Nonetheless, the following year, I had some teachers who made us only listen and take notes. Consequently, my classmates and I had terrible scores at the final exams. Had they made discussion in class, we could attain better marks.
Another equally important reason is that, by making discussion in class, teacher can teach their pupils accepting each others' ideas as well as the critical thinking. In other words, students learn that they should admit their classmates'opinion and not to get into arguement with them. Also, their ceartivity and solving problems will improve by thinking deeply in the subject of the class. For example, When I was a senior high school student, my mathematics teacher always inquired a question and wanted us to think about that thoroughly. As a result, we thought about that matter and found different ways to solve that which assisted our creativity and solving manner at that age. The following year when we entered high school we could speak in the class with our professors and explain our ideas.
In conclusoin, getting invovled in the classroom discussions not only provides the oppurtunity to reach better scores ,but also offers the chance of enhancing the imagination and creativity.
- agree 3
- efficacy of cloud seeding 76
- High school teachers (teachers of age 14-18) spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take note. Other high school teachers spend mmost of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involed in and exchan 76
- ancient vessels 85
- tpo 35 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...t forget those ideas easily, so it will effect their final grades profoundly and they ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s the oppurtunity to reach better scores ,but also offers the chance of enhancing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, well, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72496119667 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541561712846 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.778923018 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269341802701 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766650125014 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743865744309 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146240083809 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771152163901 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.