Edmontosaurus' migration
The reading pesents some evidence which indicates that the elephant-sized dinosaurs called Edmontosaurus survived the harsh winter by migrating South to more hospitale regions. The professor, however, challenges the ideas and refutes all the claims made in the article.
First, the author asserts that Edmontosaurus's diet was exclusively plants. Since there would have been no plants available during month of total darkness, they had to migrate South. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the summer climate were approperiate for plants to grow and there was sun shining twenty hours a day. Thus, the plant had left nutritous extent for Edmontosaurs.
Futhermore, the writer states that Edmontosaurs' skeleton reveals that they lived in herd and like many other modern-day animals, they would have migrated. The speaker, on the other hand, contends that these moden-day animals migate for various reasons including extra protection from predators. In addition, there are many other animals which live in herd but they do not migrate.
Finally, the passage says that since these animals could run very fast, they were physically capable of migratign long distances. Conversely, the lecturer posits that although they had these locomotive power, their children had not the ability to move in such a high speed. Therefore, the youth must stay there, which is impossible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | zahra.tmmm | 3 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | ipari5a | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lthough they had these locomotive power, their children had not the ability to mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52830188679 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67793284358 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688679245283 0.540411800872 127% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5886914141 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0656986853768 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0210104131156 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500262774564 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447822671861 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560878894024 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.