Nowadays, with the sizzling economy, more and more people are enabled to travel in order to unwind themselves and some people also view traveling as a fantastic way to deepen their understanding of another city. Whenever this topic is discussed, a general controversy arises. Some people contend that visiting shops and markets is beneficial to the understanding of the city they travel to, and others hold a different viewpoint that eating in the local restaurants should be an optimal choice. However, as far as I am concerned, touring historical museums and sites should be seen as the superior option.
In the first place, visiting historical sites and museums enable us to have a more systematic view of the development of the city we tour. What is known to us all is that those sites are always equipped with some educational institutions, and by walking in those places, we are granted the chance to grasp a clearer view of the history of this city. In the museum, there are a lot of display boards written by specialists. With some propaganda videos and high-tech interaction applications vividly demonstrating the historical stories. In this way, we can efficiently broaden our horizons and enrich our knowledge. For example, I once visited the national museum in Singapore. The curator enthusiastically talked about the history of Singapore with me. Before that, I didn't have any background knowledge of colorism and colonists in that place and have no idea of what inspired the leader to liberate the people living in Singapore, and how he enacted a series of policies to make Singapore great again. Thanks to this tour, I eventually gained a more comprehensive understanding of this country.
In addition, visiting historical spots is comparatively economical. In many places, local government has distributed a vast amount of money to museums in order to deliver benefits to the cultural life of citizens, thus the prices of most museums are always low. Sometimes, museums are free to the public on special holidays, charging no money. Although the local prices may be high owing to the development of the economy, the costs of visiting historical places and museums can always be acceptable to most tourists, compared to the luxury prices of shopping and eating. For example, last summer I went to Beijing, the capital city of China, and visited the Palace Museum, the biggest museum related to Qing Dynasty. The price of the ticket is 10 yuan, which is relatively cheaper than eating a meal in Beijing. Stepping into the museum, I saw valuable cultural heritage as well as some antiques. This experience is definitely worth the price.
Admittedly, eating and shopping also help us get a glimpse of the life of residents and establish a basic comprehension of the culture. However, it is not advisable to spare no efforts on affairs that are time-consuming as well as inefficient. We have to visit different stores and diversified cafes to achieve our goals. In modern society, the masses all value time and money, so these deficiencies cannot be compensated with ease.
In a nutshell, I definitely render my support to touring various historical sites as the best way to know a country. Only in this way, can we have a systematic view of the city in a more economical way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 83
- Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job application Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job application Contacting previous emp 90
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 81
- Do you agree with the following statement? Do people benefit more from traveling in their own country than in a foreign country? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ry of Singapore with me. Before that, I didnt have any background knowledge of colori...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.014571949 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92150429433 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 898.2 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6497394219 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.962962963 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178797490465 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045025932915 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420454441881 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110630008 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376416154597 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.