It is more important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends.
We meet plenty of people in a day and a few of them may become our good friends. As we move forward in our life, we make new friends, but it doesn't imply that we replace with the old ones. I disagree with the statement that it is more essential to keep old friends than to make new ones. Sometimes new friends play a more important role in our life then old friends. New friends can be physically present when we need help, they can help to get adapt to the new place, and they help users to learn new skills and enhances our existing knowledge.
First, we cannot categorize our friends with their importance. Either they are old or new, they have an important role in our life. We cannot just always rely on old friends because there will be some situations when we cannot be in contact with our old friends. Though communication does not seem a problem these days with mobile phones and the internet, physical distance imposes certain restrictions. Even though there will be some situations where you require the physical presence of your friend. For example, when I moved to a different town for my graduate studies, I needed help in studies for my final exams. In that situation, my new friend Cristopher was able to help me. As I mentioned above in certain situations we have to make new friends adapt to a new environment.
Second, making new friends is sometimes necessary because they can closely relate to our current situation. For example, I recently moved to the USA, and I am working as a physical therapist. I have made new friends help me to understand job protocol, work culture, patient interaction, etc. In this situation, I cannot ask help from my old friends because they might be not aware of the solution to our problems, and they may not physically in close proximity. When we make a new friends, then it does not imply that we suppose to forget our old friends.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is important to make new friends. It helps to get familiar with the new environment easily. Further, new friends are near to us, thus they can physically present to solve problems. At last, as you make new friends in life, it will help to broaden our horizons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n our life, we make new friends, but it doesnt imply that we replace with the old ones...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... distance imposes certain restrictions. Even though there will be some situations where you...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... friend Cristopher was able to help me. As I mentioned above in certain situations...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...roblems, and they may not physically in close proximity. When we make a new friends, then it do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'friend'?
Suggestion: friend
... in close proximity. When we make a new friends, then it does not imply that we suppose...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58524173028 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56063604521 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465648854962 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4590446073 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8636363636 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408950527859 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152207680004 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126500079662 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298061164659 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586962106486 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.