Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The successful people know when to say the right thing at the right time. In case I were in a meeting, where the leader of the meeting said incorrect information, I would behave according to the importance and the relevance of this information to the required work and how much impact it could have on the overall result of quality of the final product of our company or factory. I will explain my point of view in the coming paragraph in detail.
To begin with, if the incorrect information that is mentioned by the manager is essential to the work, the honesty will drive me to correct it, but in a gentle nice way that does not provoke the manager, or cause him to be angry. To say it in other words, if such wrong information could have great impact on the possibility of the success of our work mission, I would certainly try to correct it immediately. It is crucial that this interruption during the leader directions be made in a smart way. I don't think that any good manager would get angry if you drew his attention to a mistake that could cause the company a great loss. On the contrary, he would really appreciate your concentration and eagerness to protect the company form any possible loss.
In other cases, the situation and my reaction could be different, especially if the incorrect information is trivial and will not have any serious impact on the final outcome of our work progress. For example, if the manager said something like that all the company employees should always dress formally during the working hours, against to what I believe that formal clothes should be only to those who deal directly with the public, whereas, those who work in settings departments that do not have any direct contact with the customers, can wear casual attire to make them comfortable during the long working hours. In that case, I would not cut him off, and maybe wait for the right chance when we are alone. The good mood is important too, and I would smoothly reveal my opinion as a friendly suggestion.
To sum up, I believe that we have to take many factors into consideration when deciding whether we are going to interrupt the manager or not. It all depends on the importance of the incorrect information and how it could influence the outcome of work environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w in the coming paragraph in detail. To begin with, if the incorrect informat...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on during the leader directions be made in a smart way. I dont think that any good manager wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er directions be made in a smart way. I dont think that any good manager would get a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the company form any possible loss. In other cases, the situation and my rea...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opinion as a friendly suggestion. To sum up, I believe that we have to tak...
^^
Line 8, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luence the outcome of work environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, whereas, for example, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66419753086 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60907868249 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.2099108137 48.9658058833 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.928571429 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128352653879 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450172956446 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325774375717 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786928751916 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399759872522 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.