Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of a doubt, everyone can make a mistake and it is a part of human beings. However, some people must try hard to eliminate, or at least minimize, the posibility of saying something wrong. This is mostly true in people who have the role of being a instructor and their words are of much importance for many people listening them. In conditions that this kind of cast state something worng, I will absolutely stop them and guiding them to the right thing. I will elaborate on my reasons to do in this way in the following essay.
First and foremost, it is crucial to prevent the untrue thing from spreading between other people. If many people are listening the lecture or the words, they may all belive the wrong things. This can be dangerous for all people, because they might also spread that between more people. Take my friend who was teaching my classmates a mathematical function last week as an example. The day befor the exam day, we had gathered in dormitory in review our understandings. One of my friends volunteerily started to instruct others about one difficult problem. As I understood he was providing some information about another function for something else, I promptly interrupted his lecture in order to make my friends know the correct decription. Had I let him continue, all of my friends would get low score on the exam. Thus, I think it was necessary to do that.
Secondly, some people may always be in a incorrect belief due to the fact that they have never been taught the suitable one. To put in other words, we sometimes need one to enable us to know the correct thing. To illustrate, I use my own example. I have been thinking for a long time that applying for top university is of most difficult tasks. If anyone asks me about it, I would answer that do not think about that, it is impossible. Unitil the time I talked to one of my friends about this issue was I in a totally dark view. My friend, once was debating about the difficulty of getting into a top university, explained me that it only need some special works to meet the requirements of those mentioned universities.Obviously, being knowledgeable about the process of the admission, I succussfully got an admission for a top university.
In a nutshel, I believe that it is better to correct a wrong thing as soon as possible. This is totally because of two reason, first, prevent it from spreading and making the instructor to know the right thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ue in people who have the role of being a instructor and their words are of much ...
^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Secondly, some people may always be in a incorrect belief due to the fact that t...
^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Obviously
...rements of those mentioned universities.Obviously, being knowledgeable about the process ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, at least, i think, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64302059497 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81683976146 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8989477849 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2173913043 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091569904219 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258731947086 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256494829217 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616266672134 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197607257901 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.