Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is hard to decide what to do when the teacher or the meeting leader say something wrong, three ways might cause different results. I personally believe that instead interrupt and corrupt the mistake immediately or wait until the class or meeting is over and talk them privately, I would choose say nothing. There are several reasons why I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essays.
To begin with, usually a quiet person in a class or in a company would not get into troubles easily, they will be safe in most circumstances. In contrast, those who are more talkative and willing to expressive themselves are easily offend others and get into troubles. My personal experience is a compelling example for this. I used to work in a small company where is composed by 5 employees, and people were get along with each other. Because we worked as a small team, so we gave each other advice directly to complete our projects fast and nice. One time our boss said something wrong in the meeting, I interrupt and correct his mistake right away as I used to do. However, he secretly got angry at that time, and then he started to give me a hard time on my daily work, and then I got fired in three months. From then on, I choose to keep silent whenever a leader say anything incorrect to keep my job safe.
In addition, even though we try to wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader that they are wrong in the meeting or class, we still need to figure out how to tell them their mistake without offending them. Therefore, being a silent person is more easy who can save time and does not need to worry to offend others. For instance, when I was in college, our marketing teacher taught something wrong during the class. I chose not to talk her mistake and kept silent which helped me not to think too much for how to tell her mistake in suitable words.
In conclusion, I believe that it is better to say nothing when a teacher or a leader say something wrong. Because it would be safe and not getting into troubles and can save time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- When you face a difficult problem in life what do you feel is the best way to solve it asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 70
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 78
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to say'
Suggestion: to say
...and talk them privately, I would choose say nothing. There are several reasons why ...
^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'offended'.
Suggestion: offended
...ing to expressive themselves are easily offend others and get into troubles. My person...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42091836735 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34699284543 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2623779378 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285036507647 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807383604777 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958403276943 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185223869164 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100743193277 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.