Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o

When talking about what we should do if the professor or the leader says some wrong in a class or meeting, people have different opinions. Personally, I prefer to interrupt and begin a nice conversation with the lecturer right away. I feel this way based on my own experience.
At first, I would like to tell a history about my country, Taiwan. In Taiwan, there was once a period we were taught to respect the leader of our country and listen to everything a teacher told us despite the fact that schools were tapped by the government. This period is known as White Threat in 1900 to 1988. Everyone was threatened by a tough and cool leader. After a long-term fight including many good people dead, we are now able to speak out loud what we really think about. That is the freedom of speech in Taiwan. Therefore, interrupting in a meeting is a laudable behavior to honor the courage those brave people did for us. Nowadays, in Taiwan, people are encouraged to offer their own opinions in a meeting. There is even a TV show which let people call in and discuss while the president is making a presentation in an important holiday.
Even though some people argue that it is rude to interrupt the lecturer during a class, I disagree with this statement. Interrupting during the class makes students think about the problem which the lecturer is talking about rather than just listen. There is a theory that people learn better when using as many as sense abilities at the same time such as visual and vocal. In other words, what a student who only listens to the professor learned may be less than another student who talks and discusses with the lecturer.
There is another merit to correct the mistake during the meeting, to help students do the brainstorming together. Some students who are not interested in the topic at first may join the discussion together. I believe it is a better way for the technology development is from challenging and interacting with scholars and intelligent students.
For these reasons, I think interrupting right away is no doubt the best way to do when someone say something that contradicts our viewpoint.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 807, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a presentation in an important holiday. Even though some people argue that it is rude to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nterrupt the lecturer during a class. I dont think this way. Interrupting during the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...en. There is a theory that people learn better when using as many as sense abilities a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, i feel, i think, no doubt, such as, talking about, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72191011236 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62273973725 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564606741573 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6301337368 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.05 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141704888794 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419206032733 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457674953038 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886996784008 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355931319756 0.0645574589148 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.