Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When talking about what we should do if the professor or the leader says some wrong in a class or meeting, people have different opinions. Personally, I prefer to interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
At first, I want to tell a history about my own country, Taiwan. In Taiwan, there was once a period we were taught to respect the leader of our country and listen to everything a teacher told us despite the fact that schools were controlled by the government. This period is called white threat in 1900 to 1988. Everyone was threatened by a tough and cool leader. After a long-term fight including many good people dead, we are now able to speak out loud what we really think about. Therefore, interrupting in a class is a behavior to honor the courage those brave people did for us. Therefore, nowadays in Taiwan people are encouraged to offer their own opinions in a meeting. There is even a TV show which let people call in and discuss while the president is making a presentation in an important holiday.
Even though some people argue that it is rude to interrupt the lecturer during a class. I don't think this way. Interrupting during the class makes students think about the problem which the lecturer is talking about rather than just listen. There is a theory that people learn better when using as many as sense abilities at the same time such as visual and vocal. In other words, a student who listens to the professor what he learns maybe limited than another student who talks and discusses with the lecturer.
There is another merit to correct the mistake during the meeting, to help students do the brainstorming together. Some students who are not interested in the topic at first may join the discussion together. I believe it is a better way for the technology development is from challenging and discussing with scholars and intelligent students.
For these reasons, I think interrupting right away is no doubt the best way for students.
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 70
- It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 70
- TPO 49 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 90
- TPO 43 integrated. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 810, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a presentation in an important holiday. Even though some people argue that it is rude to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nterrupt the lecturer during a class. I dont think this way. Interrupting during the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...en. There is a theory that people learn better when using as many as sense abilities a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, i think, no doubt, such as, talking about, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74635568513 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60895969496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562682215743 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6379040175 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6842105263 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155980283772 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511948155776 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617358945769 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106028055427 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675542890268 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.