There are so many different people in the world. That is why there are various friends. Each friend has a different personality and through diverse ways to solve problems. If I imagine I have two friends who deal with problems in very different ways. One of my friends believes that laughter and taking things lightly is the best way to find a solution for most problems. On the other hand, my other friend believes that it is better to be serious and not take things lightly, even when dealing things with very small problems. I prefer the former one. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
To begin with, friends who take matters lightly are mostly positive. For example, if someone's test score is low, these friends say that it is okay, there are still many opportunities and it can make you grow. I think we should think this way when we solve a problem. We can not catch what is in the past. If we think positively, we can see many paths and break through our blocked thoughts. Therefore, I think these friends are really wise.
Next, if a friend takes the problem seriously, the friend's stress level is high. Most friends who take matters seriously often worry about the number of cases that do not even happen. Most of these worried friends think negatively. Then friends around people get influenced by it and turn negative or feel very tired. In fact, one of my friends cared about every test grade, and when she did not do well on the test, I was nervous and tired because I thought I was also in big trouble.
Last, a friend who thinks problem lightly is a friend who is considerate. If you take the problem too seriously, other friends can be frightened. Also, like I said before, friends get very tired. On the other hand, a friend who thinks lightly of a problem gives positive energy and cheers, so if I choose a friend, I think I definitely choose the latter. For instance, when I have a concern, I always find a friend who thinks lightly about the problem.
This is why I chose a friend who thinks lightly about the problems. This is because friends who take problems lightly are positive and give energy, while friends who take them seriously are negative and stressful. If you had two options, what would you choose?
- TOEFL integrated Question the extinction of Steller s sea cow 60
- Rembrant 3
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 83
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 3
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America s west coast from California to Alaska A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns because of 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are so many different people in the world. That is why there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...through diverse ways to solve problems. If I imagine I have two friends who deal w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57881773399 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35778620043 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455665024631 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8992558487 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.8518518519 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.037037037 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03703703704 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554321041837 0.236089414692 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164930770515 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129842709051 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333596834205 0.150856017488 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134369900968 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.