Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?
- An organization that provides food and housing to people in need
- An organization that gives people money to start their own small business
- An organization that provides medical care to people in need.
Without a shadow of a doubt, It is only by helping other individuals improve their lifes' quality that humans can satisfy their distinctive characteristics compared to other beings like animals. An unanswered question in this area is which organization is a superb approach for donating money to in order to help people. Despite all the arguments asserting that donating money to organizations which help people embark on their small business or take care of people in need of health care, I believe otherwise, maintaining that giving money to support the provision of food and house for people in need of them is a greater choice. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, rudiment demands play a pivotal role in every individuals' dominant lifestyle. In other words, people deprived of a house do not meet the first indispensable requirement for living well, which can bring about a conducive environment for a myriad of diseases. This is owing to sleeping in public places which do not have the standard levels of hygiene. On the other hand, funding organizations that provide people with medical aids is merely a remedy for a worse predicament caused by homelessness and does not cease the source of obstacles. In addition, food is also an essential need for living, and the lack of necessary nourishments can have irreversible consequences. As it is evident, providing the two most prominent needs for people who do not have them can help alleviate different problems that arose from them, and it spontaneously enhances the health care level in society. For example, think of a person who does not have anywhere to live neither has any food to eat. As a result, the person might start sleeping in the street and eat peoples' foods wastes, which in both circumstances can are vulnerable to infections.
Another reason to be mentioned is that endeavor for diminishing the number of homeless people results in a safer, happier, and more flourishing society. To put it more simply, the less the number of people without a home or food gets, the more prosperous and good-looking the society becomes because when everybody in a city has somewhere to live, they will not ruin the streets' display. On the contrary, giving money to the organizations which help poor people develop their small is specific for a minority of people and can not cover the homeless sections. Hence, when people are not concerned about the place they are going to stay or the food they have to eat, they can better concentrate on other matters such as education or job. By way of illustration, I saw an impoverished family who did not have anywhere to live. Eventually, this family got under these charities, and after a year they had their house. But what is important here is that, after having a dweller and enough food to eat, the man of this family started working in different companies and got many opportunities, and their children got to go to school as well. This shows us that how helping people in need of houses and food can help society thrive in other facets.
Reflecting upon all the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that choosing to help an organization that provides food and housing to people in need is a better approach for denoting money than two other options and virtually covers those two.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2810.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 571.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92119089317 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7913124162 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504378283713 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 884.7 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7942144282 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.80952381 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1904761905 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262190379826 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808436891772 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830715411096 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195269137175 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579948419421 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.