Is it beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks. Agree or Disagree?
With the rapid development of technology, we can easily read and listen to news from all around the world. The category of news become more multifarious, from scandal news of some movie’s superstars to the inspired news of the athlete who win the international championship. It can see that people unable to fully decide what kinds of news they prefer to read and listen. Thus, some people argue that stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or week is beneficial to us. In contrast, I disagree this view.
First, news is a tool which the government promulgates the policy so that their citizens can receiving the information quickly and easily. In this era plaguing by the novel coronavirus, people should comply with the policy in accordance with the government. And Taiwan’s government releases news of the brand-new virus every day to warn public the current situation and the instruction to follow. Therefore, people have responsible to read and listen the news everyday to avoid becoming the black sheep.
In addition, news gives people who are the underprivileged or suffered from miserable incidents a way to make the public notice them. When we see the employer exploits his or her employees or the corruption of the government officials, people will gather the power of the masses to demand the government to supervise the employer and officials or even punish them. Similarly, when people notice that miserable accidents caused by the earthquake or the typhoon, emergency supplies will come from every corner of the world. Thence, if people stop reading and listening the news for a few days, it may severely impact the potential of news. The approach for people in need may reduce their opportunity to achieve their expectation.
Indeed, there are too much misinformation glutted with the news. It makes us annoying and confused to distinguish the correction of the news. However, if we can equip with the ability of fact-checking, it still has substantial benefit for people to read and listen the news. Broaden people’s horizon is a most impressed advantage of it. We can realize different interesting things and significant news from other countries or some inspiring things such as the team winning the championship in the world.
In conclusion, I disagree the statement that stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks is beneficial.
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 68
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 79
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 76
- Some people think that older children should be required to take care of the younger children Others think that this should be done by parents or other adults Which one do you prefer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...responsible to read and listen the news everyday to avoid becoming the black sheep. I...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05808080808 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87921647527 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507575757576 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7713397031 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389730848065 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138227558485 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178710882881 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298496283782 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207636752464 0.0645574589148 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.