Choosing an opportune job, usually extremely critical to your further lifetime, is a compulsory course for each adult and thus receives much attention globally. It is accepted by some people that children should better pick jobs similar to their parents, but personally I don’t regard that it could impose uniformity in all cases.
Admittedly, sharing similar jobs with parents does provide sort of convenience. It is quite low-cost for such children to acquire essential nutrients for their personal developments due to kinship, such as basic skill trainings, proper educational resources, abundant career experiences as well as enlarged social circles. Compared with guys who cannot acquire these advanteges and must pay strenous efforts to gain such job opportunity, these children already attain sharp competitive edges in the fierce competition of the job enrollment market. However, it is an exaggeration to say that staying in parent’s area is always wise. If parents’ jobs do not match children’s own personality, this idea will become extremely excruciating.
Compared with convenience created by bloody relationship, where children’s own interest and talents lie in matters more. As an old saying goes, curiosity is always the best teacher, which implies that people choosing a job that they are interested in are more likely to become successful. Take the children's world well-known musicians for example, like Beethoven, Mozart and Paganini, their children are able to play some musical instruments but their professional achievements are never comparable to that of their parents, though they were suffused with classical tradition since an extremely young age. Rather than family atmosphere, it is one’s unique curiosity and capability that act as enduring driving forces to explore the unknown career world. Choosing a job matching their own situation, the children are more likely to realize career development.
Moreover, the job payment also deserves considering. Parents’ jobs do not always ensure financial independence in the next generation, meaning that the life quality of their children would ceritainly be impacted if they are forced to step into their parents' job. For instance, my roommate Jessica, whose parents are both broadcasters, does not decide to continue on the same job, due to the fact that almost nobody still listens to radio nowadays and thus this job could only bring about extremely moderate income. Without a reasonable monetary reward, how to sustain all the expenses of foods, clothes,rent, vehicles, utilities, credit cards and so on? Therefore, from my perspective, a job without a decent pay is not worth considering, which would inevitably decrease the satisfaction of virtually every aspect in the daily life.
To sum up, children should not always choose jobs similar to their parents’. Besides the convenience due to blood relationship, children’s interest and gifts as well as monetary rewards hould also be taken into account. After all, finding jobs is a complicated and pivotal process that more factors deserves necessary tradeoffs.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 83
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 90
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 90
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 90
- Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think isthe best and explain why.1. Plant trees and create gardens2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of p 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to consider'.
Suggestion: to consider
...Moreover, the job payment also deserves considering. Parents' jobs do not always ensur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 608, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rent
...stain all the expenses of foods, clothes,rent, vehicles, utilities, credit cards and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, after all, for example, for instance, sort of, such as, as well as, in all cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2672.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60167714885 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04027322762 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601677148847 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.644706565 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497596233745 0.236089414692 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15489278503 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113436323687 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29215184109 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281749294618 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 86.8835125448 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.