It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree?
I disagree with the given claim that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. I believe that big city should always be the first choice when it comes to children’s overall growth and development. Also, there are prodigious number of other factors that make me prefer the big city when it comes to this question.
Firstly, a big city will have tremendous number of good schools and colleges, with all the institutions competing with each other to be the best. In such an environment, it is easy for parents to search for a good educational institute for their child, because most of them will be good. For an example, in Bangalore, owing to the increased competition between schools, even the poor people can afford to send their child to a very good school at a cheaper price. A better school meaning better education and hence excellent academic growth of children. And the great thing is that good education is distributed evenly across different steps of economic ladder in a big city. On contrast, it is not conceivable for the pauper living in the country side to think about educating their children because of lack of good schools available at affordable price.
Secondly, when it comes to entertainment, big city is always number 1. This is because there are many different mediums available nowadays. For an instance, if kids want to play, they can go to any sport center and play any sport they want. Malls are also popular means of entertainment for kids. They have gotten movies, shopping centers, food courts and different video games and VR games. All these amuses children. When it comes to exploring nature, parents can take their children to outskirts of the city to experience the serenity of nature. This count is endless, whereas, the number of facilities available in the country side is limited.
In addition to having endless means of entertainments, as highlighted in the previous paragraph, children also get to explore more when they stay in the city. Take food for an instance, with so many restaurants open in the city, serving all varieties of food from different cuisines, a child will never miss on any country’s food. This helps them to understand different country’s culture without actually going there, which I believe is a very positive and good thing. Moreover, there are so many children clubs in big cities that focuses on other aspects of children’s overall growth like speaking skills, sport skills, painting, singing, etc. The amazing thing is that they are not rare and rife all over the localities. Here, children get to make new friends, compete with them in a healthy way and increase their abilities. Such kind of clubs enhances holistic strengths of children. All these cannot be found so much in abundance in the country side.
Therefore, we looked at different aspects of big cities which make them a better place for children to grow up than in the countryside. Awesome educational institutions available for all, great medium of entertainments and overall development of their well being are only possible in abundance and at ease in big cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ays number 1. This is because there are many different mediums available nowadays. For an inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 798, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to make new friends, compete with them in a healthy way and increase their abilities. Such kind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2636.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96421845574 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78833386372 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476459510358 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8962125136 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6296296296 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256008432399 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779438949442 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122165888369 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177139490467 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994721370201 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.