Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Team project is definitely more beneficial for students with respect to their learning than working alone. Working together, students not only broaden their knowledge, but also learn to work with others. Although, some people might refute this claim, I completely support it because of following reasons.
First and foremost, students learn about the subject better when they work in a team. Different students have varied perspective of pursuing the problem and can come up with contradicting or refined solutions. Rigorous brain storming on the project with conflicting opinion can help students to come up with a more sophisticated solution. For an example, when I was working on a class project, in my university, me and my team mates used to have lots of contentions which I feel helped us a lot in coming with a robust solution for the NP Hard problem which we were working on.
In addition, no student stays behind because of continuous knowledge transfer from their peers. Team work ensures that each student learns clearly about the problem and it’s potential solutions. If one student is weak in studies, his team mates can help him grapple with the problem. The veracity of this point can be proved by taking an instance of one of project work from school, wherein, my friend, Raghav, who used to fail almost all his subjects, managed to pass in the project work which was done in a team. He was helped by his team members to cope up with his difficulties and learn about the project.
Last but not the least, apart from learning in depth about the subject, a student also learns to work in a team, communicate with other people, coordinate with them, in order to finish a task. Such exercise is crude for anyone to grow in his life. To put a light on this claim, let’s meticulously draw our attention to any corporate work, where people have to perform in a big team. Their success will depend on how well they can slog with their peers. Team projects in school can help students to prepare themselves early for their upcoming opportunities.
All in all, working in a team is incumbent for a student, in order for him to learn more and succeed in his life. Thus, I absolutely endorse the idea of students working in a team than working alone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, apart from, i feel, in addition, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7989821883 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58152494737 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516539440204 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.691293937 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2631578947 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297097671219 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114361517535 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075064393103 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204873555058 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525074387543 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.