It is better to study alone than in a group
Some people believe that studying alone is better that studying together. They might argue that understanding materials comprehensively is much easier and it takes less time to study on their own. However, in my opinion, I disagree to these people and maintain that studying together in groups has much more advantages. I will support my viewpoint with following two reasons.
First of all, studying together can help you find out your misunderstandings and correct it. There can be missing knowledges or fallacies in your logic of such topic and subjects. These ignorance and misconceptions have low chance of being find out by your own. For example, my friend who is a medical student told me that when medical students prepare for the national doctor eligibility exam, they reserve an accommodation and study together for a whole week. Because of the large scope of contents to study, they help each other out by asking questions to each other and check their knowledge. Thus, one can utilize the merits of finding their unknown or misunderstood concept by help of their peers.
Second of all, it takes less time to finish studying on a subject together rather than studying alone. By working together, we can divide the contents, master each one’s portion and then merge it together to a collective knowledge. For example, I remember during my university days, I crammed on studying the night before the exams. I was chased by insufficient amount of time so I cooperated with my classmates. We separated the chapters we needed to study, and spent some time studying personally allocated chapters. After each were finished, we teached one another of what we learnt. This lead to a reduction in the time required for studying. Indeed, studying alone to finish a textbook takes “n” times longer than studying with “n” people.
To conclude, it is a controversial topic which answers varies to each individual whether studying alone or studying in a group is better. Some say studying alone has no problem in covering all of the contents and does not take much time. Nevertheless, I disagree to these people and still contend that studying group has more merits because it helps finding your weaknesses and reduces time spent required for studying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ignorance' or 'These ignorances'?
Suggestion: This ignorance; These ignorances
... your logic of such topic and subjects. These ignorance and misconceptions have low chance of b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'collective knowledge'.
Suggestion: collective knowledge
...s portion and then merge it together to a collective knowledge. For example, I remember during my univ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...udying alone has no problem in covering all of the contents and does not take much time. N...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to find' or 'find'.
Suggestion: to find; find
... group has more merits because it helps finding your weaknesses and reduces time spent ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, thus, for example, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05080213904 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78012256423 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5748388752 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9523809524 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318786061348 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983969686463 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130395043856 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218031251509 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118762218636 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.