In most countries, the average workdays are five days a week. In this regard, some individuals believe that it is better to work in shorter days with longer working hours, as they can work only three days a week with longer duration instead of working five days a week with shorter time. I, personally, both agree and disagree with this viewpoint due to several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
On the one hand, three days working makes a lot of free time for people, in which they can learn new things or spend more time with their families. Although individuals can use their time after short working hours, most of them are tired and cannot focus on a particular subject, comprehensively. Also, their leisure time limits to only two days, which leads to decline to be vigorous. An example of this is my father, who is a physician. He used to go to work five days a week, and during weekends he did not have enough energy to devote for his family. Now, he decided to change his schedules and decrease his working time into three days a week without rest. His decision has a good effect on our lives, for we can spend more pleasure time together. Therefore, it is beneficial for individuals to work only three days a week for long hours.
On the other hand, most of the employers believe that long hours working decrease their employees’ efficiency, drastically. In this situation, the rate of dissatisfaction consumer (demand) rate may increase which is has a negative effect on costumers’ viewpoints. Imagine that a nurse has nominal mistakes in his/her job, which may cause irreparable damages for patients. Consequently, five days a week working with shorter hours is better, because people do not have to be in a stressful situation not to make any mistakes.
All in all, there are several remarkable reasons to reveal the positive and negative impact of this decision. I believe that longer working hours with shorter days in a week has a lot of pros and cons. Therefore, I described some of the advantages and disadvantages of this decision for a system in the aforesaid paragraphs.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 73
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation, trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?-- Reading about the places online--Discussing the pl 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...f pros and cons. Therefore, I described some of the advantages and disadvantages of this de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a system in the aforesaid paragraphs.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, may, so, therefore, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78541828958 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2350188527 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2777777778 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397575168582 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128725616239 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120580752096 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240948208878 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601410230953 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.