It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not having a career that needs three days a week with long hours of working is more pleasurable than a job with five days a week for shorter hours has received a great deal of attention from job-seekers and employers. Although some may say that five days working with short hours of working has a high yield of working compare to working for longer hours; I, as well as many others, believe that doing a job which allocates three days of a week brings several positive points for employees such as having more time for spending on pleasure activities, having time for spending with family and friends, and having adequate time for starting a second job.
First of all, an important reason why working three days a week is more enjoyable is that the labor force having more free time rather than others. Many psychologists assert that people need do pleasure activities besides their work for improving mental health. In this situation, when a person only works three days a week, he or she has adequate free time to allocate to enjoy activities such as doing sports, going camping, or playing a musical instrument. Furthermore, doing physical activity such as walking, riding a bicycle or going to the gym helps people not only improving mental condition but also improving the physical condition of their body.
Another reason for the importance of working three days a week is that people need to spend enough time with their family members and friends. One of the characteristics of humans is that they are sociable; thus, for improving this characteristic, they should allocate enough time for families and friends. Furthermore, parents had to assign time and energy for playing with children and helping them in their school rehearsals. In this situation, if parents only do their job for three days a week, they would have enough time for spending with their children. Also, when parents are at home for four days, they do not need to spend money on the nurse or kindergarten for taking care of children, so they can save money.
Finally, it is occasionally said that because of a hectic life, people need to select a second job for earning more money. In the modern era, because of the high cost of living, people had to work hard for handling life. So, when workers work three days a week, they have enough free time for starting a second job or going to learn new skills for starting their own job. Nevertheless, by working five days a week, the labor forces do not have sufficient time and energy for doing a second job.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that working three days a week is more enjoyable than working five days chiefly due to workers have time for spending with family and friends and starting a second job, and doing pleasure activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO 45 73
- TPO 50 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 85
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 83
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not having a career that needs three days a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81526104418 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50783517608 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427710843373 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2324722123 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.875 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480427348418 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202118208624 0.076458572812 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139572203078 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336349948968 0.150856017488 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11723513985 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.002688172 265% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.247311828 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.