It is more important to work at a job that you enjoy than it is to earn a lot of money.
The ultimate concept is that we work for money. But when money becomes the only and only driving factor between us and our job, the resulting scenario can turn rather unpleasant. "Love what you do and do what you love," that is what my mantra is. Hence, I list down few points below that can help to explain my take in support of the notion.
To begin with, I believe the less self-motivated one is, the lesser efforts one is likely to put into his work. Imagine waking up every single day and going to work at a job that you dislike. Eventually, this will turn frustrating enough to lose all your self-motivation. A few days back, I was talking to a friend when she mentioned her growing disinterest at her work. As she never wanted to be a manual quality analyst but a data scientist, she sounded highly demotivated with her quality analyst role for a higher salary hike. She concluded by agreeing that it was a wrong decision on her part when she had chosen money over her interest.
Secondly, keeping ourselves updated on the new advancements made in our work domain can never be neglected. But a person who works only for money will hardly agree to invent his time on learning and exploring his field of work. Additionally, this can be because of his ignorance about understanding that his job is his road to self-development as well. As a software engineer myself, it is of utmost importance to keep up with new technologies in our industry for the mutual benefit of the employer and the employees. Yet, for example, a handful of individuals, who least enjoy their work, refuse to invest a few extra hours on self-education and ultimately put an end to their career growth.
Last by not least, individuals who do not enjoy their work are often very critical about both their job and workplace. They end up complaining even about little things like the grinder in the coffee machine and end up blaming others when they are unable to perform up to the standards. Since they lack interest, they spend time everywhere but their work. For instance, we have often heard about those employees who take unnecessary long lunch breaks or brag around the office about their efforts, pretending to have worked their fingers to the bone.
The inference is simple. If one enjoys the work, one is motivated to give most of one's efforts rather than an individual who is just working for money. The former brings out the best results. And indeed, these results positively influence his career graph.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...os;Love what you do and do what you love,' that is what my mantra is. Hence, I li...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the ones') or simply say ''most ones''.
Suggestion: most of the ones; most ones
...joys the work, one is motivated to give most of ones efforts rather than an individual who i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... work, one is motivated to give most of ones efforts rather than an individual who i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73287671233 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66493129404 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8196596391 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1304347826 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0434782609 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21197308052 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569431135049 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589500037044 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113683194987 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226937363991 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.