It is said that the best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, people have been thinking that one of the major problems of ecosystems is related to the cost of fuel. Although the fuel has the main character in producing pollution, there are some beneficial elements from the fuels that you could not eliminate that. That is due to the crucial function in lives of people and this matter that all of the environmental problems are not originated from the fuel.
All of us know, some matters are fundamental for people that want to be alive, the fuel is one of them; therefore, you could not reduce the amount of them with new strategies. To put it differently, people utilize from these source in all aspects of their life; thus, they couldn’t replace them by another source and you could not change this situation with the change in the price of that. If you investigate anything, you definitely see one trace of fuel in them. For example, the petrol is the major requirements of people’s car, fossil fuels are used to making peripheral pieces of the car, for producing color is needed to utilize from raw fossil fuels.
The environmental problems are spread out among a tremendous number of factors; thus, you could not correlate them to fuel products. In otherwise stated, although the fuel is one the main cause of problems of environments, there are a host number of other agents that they effect on our circumstance. The researchers of an academic institute in Tehran shown that just 25% of environmental problems are derived from fuels acquired. Consequently, you could not solve the problems of the environment just with varying the price of fuels while they play a major role in our life.
As outlined above, the important role of fuel is approved for all of the people; hence, you could not change this matter with making a difference in their prices. That is because of the people are needed to use them for their life and you cannot consider the fuel the main agent of environmental problems.
- Some people suggest that there should be restrictions on a detailed description of crimes in the newspapers and on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’s deve 60
- It is said that the best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Other believe that going p classes should be optional. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...in lives of people and this matter that all of the environmental problems are not originat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... important role of fuel is approved for all of the people; hence, you could not change thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81656804734 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70956172277 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2584708023 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208931395891 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942597293921 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359482177571 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144233599353 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042218187666 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.