Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Teamwork is a key to have a successful society which obviously needs a professional leader. While most people think leadership comes naturally, the others hold the opposite perspective. I firmly think everyone can be a good leader by training because of some significant reasons which will be explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, being a leader is more like a skill than a natural characteristic. Everyone can learn new skills by practicing, therefore, everyone can be a leader too. For example, the Japanese are renown because of their ability to be a leader. In Japan, education system pays attention to teamwork and ability to be leadership. Because they believe that the first 3 years of school is not for learning science. Moreover, the aim of their education program for 5 to 10 years old students is to teach them how to work in a team and how to be a leader. Hence, most of them are expert leaders by learning this at school not naturally. It clearly implies that everyone can be a leader.
Second, there is no impossible for human beings. The history indicates that humans are able to do even the hardest work just by making efforts, thus, everyone can become a leader by putting time and effort. For instance, when I was in high school, it was dramatically hard for me to have a good presentation. I was under a lot of stress because of speaking in the front of audiences. But I attempted a lot to overcome my stress by doing some presentation in front of my student. Fortunately, I could do it which taught me all dreams are possible for us.
To conclude, maybe some people are not enough motivated to be a leader, but they can become a qualified leader as well as others. Being a leader can be learned and everything is possible for humans. I recommend that if you feel that you are not appropriate for being a leader, just try it for several times, you absolutely will change your mind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65486725664 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78529191388 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9691378634 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306974343341 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101239181974 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788702896558 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194372934418 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106503507327 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.