Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Teamwork is a key to have a successful society which obviously needs a professional leader. While most people think leadership comes naturally, the others hold the opposite perspective. I firmly think everyone can be a good leader by training because of some significant reasons which will be explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, being a leader is more like a skill than a natural characteristic. Everyone can learn new skills by practicing, therefore, everyone can be a leader too. For example, the Japanese are renown because of their ability to be a leader. In Japan, education system pays attention to teamwork and ability to be leadership. Because they believe that the first 3 years of school is not for learning science. Moreover, the aim of their education program for 5 to 10 years old students is to teach them how to work in a team and how to be a leader. Hence, most of them are expert leaders by learning this at school not naturally. It clearly implies that everyone can be a leader.
Second, there is no impossible for human beings. The history indicates that humans are able to do even the hardest work just by making efforts, thus, everyone can become a leader by putting time and effort. For instance, when I was in high school, it was dramatically hard for me to have a good presentation. I was under a lot of stress because of speaking in the front of audiences. But I attempted a lot to overcome my stress by doing some presentation in front of my student. Fortunately, I could do it which taught me all dreams are possible for us.
To conclude, maybe some people are not enough motivated to be a leader, but they can become a qualified leader as well as others. Being a leader can be learned and everything is possible for humans. I recommend that if you feel that you are not appropriate for being a leader, just try it for several times, you absolutely will change your mind.
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 80
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 92
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 80
- Technology made our life better. do you agree or disagree 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65486725664 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78529191388 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9691378634 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306974343341 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101239181974 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788702896558 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194372934418 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106503507327 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.