Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
In today's world, leadership and management are of paramount importance for society to achieve its goals. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether could people learn to be a leader or they can gain this by practice. Some people possess the conviction that the former could be more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more captivating. I personally, content that this issue is multifaceted. I think we can gain our achievements by focusing on our abilities. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is we as humans are tenacious and we can get out goals by practice. But some soft skills are intellectual and we can only control the theme. They had never increased by hard work and practice. Consider my personal experience to make the point more clear. One of my friends is so clever and she can learn very fast. But she has a problem with communication with new guys. She is shy and can not start talking, Thus she misses good and pleasant opportunities in her life. After several months of practicing, now, she can control herself and tolerates the conversation. Moreover, I believe that leadership is a type of these soft skills.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that some people may have not able to be leaders but they are. In this situation, we think they can control the team by some restricted rules or unamiable attributes. For instance, I know the man, who is my previous boss, who was unable to lead the team. He hold team members for long meetings and asked them for huge work. He always spoke with the team unfriendly. That was a dysfunctional and dreary situation.
In brief, Contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I think Leadership comes naturally, ever hard working.
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 66
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is we as humans are tenac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...ss, who was unable to lead the team. He hold team members for long meetings and aske...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, for instance, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87236284608 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4064624816 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132370760856 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315876748677 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469944016359 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821916367942 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304139746541 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.