Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. Nevertheless, some adamantly believe it is not worth it to know about what happened earlier, others believe that it's always useful to carefully have the past time understood. In my humble opinion, getting to absorb and digest your past is beneficial for the following compelling reasons;
The majority of individuals would agree with the notion that old is gold. In other words, our heritage is an inevitable resource that we have to utilize. To further explain, not many countries have a civilization like the one established by the ancient Egyptians. That's why The Egyptian Government always allocate a significant part of its yearly budget to conserve this treasure and know more about it. By doing so, the Egyptians fully understood the value behind their unique heritage. Consequently, Nowadays, the government and many voluntary organizations are launching many campaigns all over the world to encourage people across the globe to visit Egypt depending on the interesting and mysterious stories about their ancient civilization. Those activities succeeded to grab the world's attention toward the African nation which is generating enormous revenue as a result of this action. All in all, what have been accomplished in the past can impact the future significantly.
On top of this, understanding old slips are likely to serve you do the right things in the future. To better explain, most of today`s inventions have witnessed a dramatic transformation compared to its primitive form. Take desktops as an example; computers used to be enormous that cannot even fit in a whole room. Also, they possessed a tiny storage capacity, and they tend to offer a low-quality performance. Nowadays, nonetheless, many of us have a hand-sized notebook that can be carried in just a small pack back, these small laptops can function much better than two or three of the giant computers used before. This is because experts have investigated what has been done wrong and what could be changed in order to design a high-quality device. All in all, lessons from the past can always direct us to the right path.
No doubt that well-understanding of our history and wisely treating it is advantageous. Not only will it enable communities to reach prosperity via getting that knowledge fully exploited, but it will also allow more advanced and developed discoveries to arise by defeating errors occurred in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...its always useful to carefully have the past time understood. In my humble opinion, getti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e established by the ancient Egyptians. Thats why The Egyptian Government always allo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... Those activities succeeded to grab the worlds attention toward the African nation whi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, no doubt, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16425120773 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97532384538 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613526570048 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2977296156 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.526315789 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127474790919 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331778109044 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309942241644 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070129286229 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220772663106 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.