write about the advantages and disadvantages of living a traditional/modern lifestyle.
While some people prefer to live an urban life, others believe that living a rural life is best. With modern life, individuals will benefit from the technology advancements main cities offer and with traditional life, they will enjoy the healthy life style a countryside has..
Firstly, metropolis cities have all means of comfort. In other word, people who live there can have access to all the amenities that will make their lives more comfortable. A friend of mine for example, lives in one of those tall buildings in New York City. He controls everything in his apartment with a remote control. Also, the skyscraper where he lives has a fully equipped gem and a nice restaurant, so he has all what he needs in one place. Consequently, he feels happy. On the other hand, people who inhabit the countryside of any country feel well mentally and physically. This is because, there are many farms, trees and green areas surrounding them and that provide them with fresh air and pure oxygen. Also, they eat fresh organic crops made by their own hands, thus they are not exposed to junk food that can result in dangerous aliments such as, diabetes and obesity. Therefore, individuals in both sides of a country would have upsides to enjoy.
With regards to downsides, a crucial problem of living away from main cities is the few job opportunities available. To better explain, most of the big corporates do not have offices in remote areas. Consequently, one would struggle to get a good job with a descent salary and that would badly affect his career pathway in comparison with his colleagues with the same level of education working in capital cities. And a downside of Living in modern cities is the detrimental impact it may has on people`s health. This is due to the unhealthy life style individuals in such places live. They usually do not have time to cook and depend mainly on fast food chains like KFC or McDonald`s for their diet, and that will end up getting life threatening diseases. Also, the air in big cities is full of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide emitted from vehicles and factories` trucks which will also has negative effects on the long run. Therefore, each area either central or remote has its own disadvantages.
In conclusion, depending on their life preferences, individuals will have some benefits and also some issues such as short life cycles because of multiple risk factors individuals in urban life face and limited resources to grow in their careers for those who prefer the rural life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...the healthy life style a countryside has.. Firstly, metropolis cities have ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy life style a countryside has.. Firstly, metropolis cities have all mean...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country would have upsides to enjoy. With regards to downsides, a crucial pro...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or remote has its own disadvantages. In conclusion, depending on their life p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91224018476 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67343336774 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558891454965 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3195351991 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817780181536 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278946099394 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393113150669 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532734643694 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036268061625 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.