Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Agree/Disagree
Advertisement has been playing a vital role from the emergence of the Medias. Some people believe that advertisement help people to find their best suitable product, without any magnification. However, others have a divergent thinking and say advertisements are sometimes misleading and oppose the mentioned statement. From my perspective, advertisement may show the product better than what it is. I take this view in the light of the following reasons.
First and foremost, advertisements are always attractive and can have a big influence especially on some group of people whom could not decide rationally like children. Imagine a kind of snack that is not healthy. There is a TV advertisement which shows a cartoon favorable character eats this type of food. Children always like to do same as their lovely cartoon characters. As a result they will encourage using this product and they may face some problems by eating this unhealthy food.
The second aspect to describe here is that, advertisements always show the functionality of their products in some suitable situations not in all the situations in real life. For example, consider a watch that producer show its color is not change after 20 years of using. It is a true fact in a dry region. However, it may not be true if it is used in a humid region. Therefore, it will be misleading for those customers who live at humid geographical regions.
Last but not least, advertisements always select their best product to show to audience. I have an experience about this phenomenon. I saw a car advertisement in the internet. The car had a lot of facilities and they were showing their product has a good functionality. I decided to buy it. Although it had some of that functionality, I am not satisfied with my choice because a lot of features that I have seen in the advertisement are not working properly.
To put in a nutshell, advertisement not only does not help us to select the best suitable product, but also, it could be misleading because of its exaggeration in some cases based on the aforementioned reasons. It is highly recommended for the governments to select some organizations in charge of supervision of the content of advertisements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, kind of, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98924731183 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19975592346 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7459367702 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6956521739 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1739130435 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152351459549 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428488657026 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496213049721 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875290332848 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448199216159 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.