Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
Nowadays, there are many sources of news that each of them presents some aspects of the events. Due to the paramount importance of the source of the news in people's view, a heated debate exists over whether how should people catch the news efficiently. I firmly believe that people should try to get the latest news from the others who have the different viewpoints on issues. Not only can they comprise them with their own understanding about different subjects, but also, they will be familiar with different aspects of the events.
First and foremost, people can make a comparison between what they really think about something and what the others believe. This comparison often paves the way for further investigation by people to analyze the real circumstances. Consequently, having comprehensive knowledge about an issue will challenge their previous viewpoints. Nobody can ignore the importance of this procedure on elevating the level of awareness in societies. In other words, this method allows people to have a deep sight on a verity of problems. For instance, people who get the economic news from the different sources with different opinions, not the same as their own, will be able to analyze them with their calculations about specific financial matters. As a result, the most reasonable answers will be extracted by this comparison on monetary issues.
The second point is that the more variety of opposite viewpoints on a subject, the more unknown aspects will be clarified for people. It's obvious that each event has different aspects which special group of people with biased opinions cannot present them well to others. In fact, they just present some parts of the story. The other parts which are often undesirable for them are ignored easily by people. Hence, if a person takes the news from different sources with different viewpoints, all the aspects will be clear to him. Based on my own personal experience, I had a friend who was a serious advocate of democratic groups. He just explained some their opinions about human rights and I as a democratic student, never heard anything about the other aspects of human rights. Participating in a conference with different political viewpoints caused that I am aware the other significant points in this regard. Had I taken the political news from my friend, I would not have had invaluable information about this issue.
By taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that getting the news from sources with opposite viewpoints is a rational strategy for people. For sake of the brevity, two main reasons are mentioned in this essay to clarify the importance of this viewpoint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by this comparison on monetary issues. The second point is that the more variet...
^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arify the importance of this viewpoint.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, really, second, so, well, for instance, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10022779043 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72838362209 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498861047836 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9916092513 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.772727273 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205676740104 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628673545724 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550030050203 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138068429486 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634845226958 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.