Nowadays a lot of students use technology like computers and smartphones for doing school work. Some teachers believe that we should not limit students because it is an effective way of learning. Others claim that we should limit students’ use of these devices. Which one do you agree with?
Nowadays, the advancement of technology is taking place so quickly and its effects on modern life are inevitable. Utilizing high-tech devices is widespread along different groups of people and students are not exempt from this fact. However, some instructors believe that students should not use modern devices for doing their assignments, others believe otherwise and support using these kinds of technologies. I concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that the enhancement of technology provides access to a wide range of information for all people. So, restricting the access of students to this valuable information is a big obstacle to their learning process. In today’s life, thanks to the improvement of technology, specifically in the education field, students can get access to new methods of learning from online courses to virtual physics and chemistry labs, and in this way, they can understand scientific concepts more effectively. Take a personal experience as an example; when I was in high school, I remember that I had serious problems with some parts of physics because the lab of our school did not have enough pieces of equipment for doing practical experiments and the teachers should try to explain some experiments without doing them. The more they explained, the more I became confused because could not imagine the situation which they had explained. Eventually, in university, I got a chance to do those experiments, and after more than four years, I understood my teachers' meaning and became able to solve my misconceptions about high school physics. But now, my younger brother studies in the same high school that I did, due to the improvement of technology, he can easily connect to the school virtual lab and do any kind of physics experiment without any limitation.
In addition, no one can cast a shadow of suspicion on this notion that cutting trees down has a catastrophic effect on the planet, because, they are the lungs of the earth and the most important source of producing oxygen. So, finding alternative ways for decreasing the need to demolish the trees is crucial. Indeed, doing homework using modern devices can be a proper substitution way that has some environmental benefits like decreasing the demand for paper and therefore for cutting trees. To put it into a more vivid picture, in the past, students needed to buy notebooks for each lesson and they also had plenty of books, pencils, and other stuff. Cutting down many trees was needed for providing these wooden base materials. But nowadays, students can use E-books instead of printed materials and do their assignments by software like paint or Microsoft Word which leads to less use of paper and consequently less need to cut trees.
By taking into account all the above reasons and so many others, I believe that access of students to modern technology should not be limited. That is because such devices help students to understand their lessons better, and also due to reducing the demand for paper are useful for the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | Aliakbari94 | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Aliakbari94 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- TPO 55 integrated 65
- TPO 50 Integrated 80
- task 1 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2634.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07514450867 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79815359425 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 810.0 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3589377645 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.631578947 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3157894737 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318743453012 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936851856518 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787746912277 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210885552669 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043439511151 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.