Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Recently, schools and colleges developed the policy of working on projects as team. Some people believe it is good idea and some people rejected this idea. In my opinion, I agree that students should work in a group to finish their assignement. The bases of my view are communication and get recognized.
First of all, on the communication level, when students work as one team they must communicate with each other to achive their goal. Hence, they have to exchange ideas, suggestions, and solve problems with thier classmates, As a result, they will gain advantages in different scales, such as:mental and social level. Moreover, their abiliy of analytical thinking, crtitical judjment, and how to response to an aregument will be imporoved. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. When I was in college, in a biology class, we had to conduct a project about cats behivor, I was assigned to group of five members, where we divieded tasks, I had the opportinuity to exepres my opinion and explore other people thinking process. Consequently, I gained the skill of comminication, be a teamplayer, and feeling the free of speaking about my suggestion in front my current manger. If I did not involved with a group during my undergrad studies, I would not develop these skills.
Second, by working with group of people, a hard work student can be recognized. Since projects mainly depand on discussions, the smarts person can "shin" easliy and have more opportinuities to get future career. For instances, a student is working alone, will mainly have an A grade and only his professor will know about him, on other hand, if a student have the chance to work with his classmates in a team, he can shin by his way of thinking, how her approach tasks, and how fast he can finish them, As a direct effect, he will build a good reputation and eventually, get recommended by one of his collaegue and secure a good job. So, working on project have the advantgeous of recognition of smart, hard working student and opens new future opportinutiy.
In conclusion, I believe that the requirement made by colleges in term making student work in a group to achive certain project is beneificial. This is because it will enhance the skills of communication, further, intellgent students will be esaily recognized.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use details and examples to support your answer 85
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ped the policy of working on projects as team. Some people believe it is good ide...
^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'involve'
Suggestion: involve
...n front my current manger. If I did not involved with a group during my undergrad studie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up of people, a hard work student can be recognized. Since projects mainly depand...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smarts'' or 'smart's'?
Suggestion: smarts'; smart's
...jects mainly depand on discussions, the smarts person can 'shin' easliy and ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: an; A
...dent is working alone, will mainly have an A grade and only his professor will know ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, speaking about, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97948717949 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99946960027 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1041698343 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.235294118 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1873453995 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650419831856 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639242376698 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12710677781 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329577934503 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.