Debates about wheater to help others are usually displayed in our society nowadays. Some individuals think that we need not to help people we don’t know because we need to protect ourselves. However, I think today’s people are more glad to help others than before. I will elaborate on my discussion for three reasons.
First of all, nowadays people have more chance to help others than they were in the past. In the past, we always worked and deal with life around our own families and neighbors, so even we desire to help others, we usually did’t have chances or methods. Today, we have morden lives and we can connect with others more, thus we can help more people we don’t know. Take a small village for account, in the past the residents in the village known eachother and no one got famillar with outside world. In a morden village, people can know news out of the village and then they can send their clothing or food to whom may need.
Second, education makes people more glad to help others than before. Without education, people are always focusing themselves, and people often see others as hostiles. On the otherhand, people who is uneducated lessly help their families and neighborhoods, not to mention a person they don’t know. In contrast, today’s world people can get more teaching and are taught to be kindness to others. Some education institute will hold some activities to help people have a concern with helping others. In many contries, some charity organizations are benificial from people who get educated by local schools. In such schools, teachers give adolescents a thinking that helping others is somewhat a helping to themselves.
Last but not least, some people may have an idea that today’s people are busier than before, so they have no time to help others. Nevertheless, even though people in this morden world have more issues to focus and more affairs to do, they still have some methods to give help to others. For example, we have smartphones now, and we can exploit them to trasfer money to whom need to buy what they need, and we also can use the phone to call for a host when we find his/her losting cat. There are a lot of technology approaches for us to give other people a hand and establish a connection with them. In fact, the morden society gives us more facilliate ways to help eachother. We can see a lot of people join some activies which advocate people to help children in Africa, who don’t have enough food or clear water.
In conclusion, to discuss a social issue need a lot of observations and understandings. However, I think people are more glad to help others, particularly to whom they don’t know.
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 70
- Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other Which of these two approaches do you 85
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 81
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 86
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
...Some individuals think that we need not to help people we don’t know because we need to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7660944206 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51450231939 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476394849785 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.376662334 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5416666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476704060945 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160827263261 0.076458572812 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926038141514 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30033057503 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549477945216 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.