Some individuals believe that when we give feedback to our classmates in schools or colleagues in work conditions, we need to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative feedback can facilitate the assignments. Nevertheless, I think I will give positive comments in such circumstances.
First and foremost, positive comments can enhance work efficiency. If people receive positive feedback from others, they will be happy and be more willing to do the job. Take my friend, Johnson, for example, he and I both work at a company that is famous for the design of public buildings. We had trouble when we struggled with a difficult proposal for the city airport’s new terminal. When I received his design, I gave him positive and encouraging feedback first with negative answers additionally. He was confident when received my message, and eventually, we finished the design faster than before. In the contrast, if I just gave him negative comments firstly, he would be frustrated and upset about the work.
Second, positive comments can lead to easy changes in work or assignments. During the collaboration, if friends put objective and positive messages first, they will work in a better atmosphere. People are instinctively hoping for good messages from each other, and a relatively mild attitude toward feedback can bring such good information. When colleagues get positive feedback, they will reduce the barrier in their minds, and will be less reluctant to revise their work. If we just put negative or criticize things in the title of our feedback, the receiver will be unhappy to get understand our advice.
Finally, some people may hold an attitude that criticism can enhance because it can push our colleagues to quickly solve the problem. However, if we just focus on the negative aspect of the question, we will frequently lose our patience, and as a consequence, we will tap into many meaningless conflicts and arguments. Therefore, we need to give the receiver a good impression first, and then elaborate on our discussions or debatations.
In conclusion, there is a lot of thinking on how to advise our friends or working partners, and the discussion about that always falls into unceasingly talking. In my opinion, we should initially give our friendly and peaceful information, to get the trust and comprehend of our classmates or colleagues, then we can enhance our collaboration and know each other better.
- Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong They have similar interests and 88
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
- Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other Which of these two approaches do you 85
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative fe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97519327103 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1581249514 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249661003389 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946782210906 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863959556276 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165656950596 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110847700618 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.