One should never stop chasing their dreams even it they seem impossible to achieve.
Almost everyone in this world has an objective or goal they want to achieve. Personally, I feel that one should never give up on their goals, even if they seem impossible to fulfil. I would like to state two major reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First, the consistency with which we will work to reach our goals will teach us many valuable lessons. Even if we do not succeed in achieving what we want, our determination and diligence will teach us to be persistent and optimistic in our lives. My personal experience is a good case in point. I like writing fictional novels. Since my school days, I have dreamed to be a writer, so for that, I have practised writing several new stories but never managed to get my fiction published. Nevertheless, I didn’t stop writing different story lines, and as a result, now I am a professional writer for a television serial. Had I not been practising writing, I wouldn’t have been able to land such a great job.
Second, people who remain dedicated to their job sometimes meet new people in their journey who would lend them a helping hand. People who have profundity in their thoughts usually find real talent and assist them to become even more dexterous in their skills. One of my cousins, Ria, was really passionate about software engineering. Given her lack of academic credentials and work experience, many of her friends thought that she wouldn’t be able to achieve much. But she kept striving hard to design new software and to upload it to her website. Soon she was hired by the manager of a multinational firm, even though she lacked most of the formal qualifications for the position.
In a nutshell, I would like to conclude that one should never stop chasing their dreams, but instead always try hard to make them come true. To recapitulate, consistency teaches us many abilities that become useful later in life, and some successful people might help us out on our journey towards our goals and objectives. Hence, due to the aforementioned reasons, I believe that it is best to work towards our dreams without being discouraged, even if they seem to be an endless hunt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
- Old people enjoy their life less than younger generations 76
- One should never burrow money from a friend this is not good for their relationship 73
- If you have extra money are you happier giving it to charity or spending it yourself 70
- Whether government should fubd public transports or improve the condition of roads 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77609451659 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590296495957 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7770796626 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2105263158 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280849163977 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070958132456 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108452969655 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175576620415 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091025705037 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77609451659 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590296495957 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7770796626 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2105263158 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280849163977 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070958132456 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108452969655 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175576620415 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091025705037 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.