the only unchangable thin is the change itself they said and I could not agree more. Time never stops and that makes the change unevitable so the normal or standardized things evolve to other definitions. Young generation can keep up with these new innovations and routines however I cannot say the same phrase for the older ones in other words our parents. I would like to explain my notion in this following essay.
First of all, with the improving technology many things have changed in terms of working conditions, payments, job and education opportunuties, life styles, daily and future concerns, the way we act in our lives, the understanding on luxury and many more that I did not even mention. The new understanding in these areas are very familiar to us but on the contrary, not to our mothers and fathers. Because, they are used to the previous version of these fields and now it is hard to change their habits. That is why, sometimes our requirements and wishes seem and sound so strange and extraordinary to them. I do not expect them to see the world as we saw but at least I would like to see them trying to keep up and fit in.
Another thing that gives me this idea is that the change in time made humankind violent and selfish. I hear the stories of our families in the past and I admire those times. Because they could easily trust and help people, more importantly they could be friends very simply. When we look at todays community, we can see that the many people are able to anything for their benefits even hurt someone. Although I feel very angry about their concerning behavior, I can understand why they are so preservative and strict on some rules. Horrible people are on the news and TV who are spreading fear to our hearts and I think we are gonna be stricter than our families in next eras of our lives.
In a nutshell, the changes can be in a good way or bad way but they are exist. Consequently, it is going to make harder to communicate with eachother.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important for the government to provide money for beautiful things and not just for practical things 90
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 66
- Do you agree or disagree with this statementOne of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job 70
- Do you agree or disagree that students should not have cell phones in class 70
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the only unchangable thin is the change its...
^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our families in next eras of our lives. In a nutshell, the changes can be in a g...
^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...e in a good way or bad way but they are exist. Consequently, it is going to make hard...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, another thing, at least, i feel, i think, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50692520776 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57530143274 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565096952909 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5664246222 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7058823529 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100267016576 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317062765572 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041127190596 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558279490551 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338892720097 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.