To begin with, young people in the past lacked life experience whereas young people today can obtain as much life experience as they want readily on the internet, which helps young people today to make their life choices. For example, 30 years ago, my father, who just graduated from high school, was thinking about what major to study. There was no way for him to know those majors based on his own personal life experience. Besides, at that time, little information about what kinds of people should choose what major was available out there. The only thing my father could do was to listen to my grandparents. However, when I was trying to determine my major 3 years ago. I could easily just google the name of major and numberless information came out on my screen. Furthermore, I could also talk with people who had already in one major and ask how did they feel about their majors. The information online and life experience of people online were extremely beneficial for me to make a decision on my major.
Secondly, young people in the past were expected to be listening to their parents several decades ago, however, young people today are much encouraged to make decisions by themselves. For instance, my uncle loved and wanted to marry a woman whose parents was not as good as my grandparents financially. Because of that, my grandparents didn't allow my uncle to marry that woman and forced him to marry another woman he had never met before. In the past, parents' word worked like order because of some historical culture. Therefore, young people at that time depended on their much very much when they were making decisions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that young people today have better capability to make their own decisions but young people in the past were more likely to do things according to the advice from their parents. On one hand, young people in the past had little information to refer to, however, many information is accessible for young people today based on which they can make proper decisions. On the other hand, young people today are encouraged to be responsible for their own lives whereas young people in the past were expected to listen to their parents.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 68
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 61
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ially. Because of that, my grandparents didnt allow my uncle to marry that women and ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y much when they were making decisions. In conclusion, I strongly believe that y...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82105263158 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49103100283 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484210526316 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7686642794 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.764705882 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478719203156 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163354757833 0.076458572812 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163955325746 0.0737576698707 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377653062256 0.150856017488 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119724243425 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.