People Act Differently When They Wear Different Clothes. Do You Agree that Different Clothes can Change the Way People Behave? Use Specific Examples to Support Your Answer.
The term Enclothed Cognition is used to described one effect that our clothes seems to have on various psychological processes like emotions, self evaluations, and interpersonal interactions, which in turns attributes to our behaviors, attitudes, personality, mood, and confidence. The 44 page dress code published by Swiss bank UBS that went viral online perfectly justified Enclothed Cognition. One of the sensible code in the UBS dress principle described :“If you wear a watch, it suggests that reliability and punctuality is a great concern to you.” Clothes affect our behavior and our moods because of the symbol meaning that the society ascribe to different type of attire.
To me, the term’s theory seems perfectly valid. My outfit for the day varies me in distinctive ways. For instance, wearing gym clothes makes me more likely to exercise after work that it acts as a reminder in making a healthy choice, and wearing business casual makes me more creative at work and presents me as a more friendly person. The attire empowers and impacts how we behave and feel.
Similarly, clothes that associate with specific role activates the knowledge and experience about how people from that profession should behave. Lab coat, as an example, makes the scientist more conscious and serious with their logic thinking and study operation and thus making fewer mistakes.
Above descriptions explains that the appearance we wear subtly affects our choice of behavior, attitude, and mindset. Namely, the argument that clothes affects an individual’s role playing and role making is valid.
- Some people believe that playing games can teach us about life. Do you agree? why or why not? use specific examples and reasons to support your answer. 73
- Some people prefer to live with a roommate. Others prefer to live aline. Compare the advantages of each choice. Which of these two options do you prefer? Use Specific Reasons to Support Your Answer. 66
- Some people prefer to live in a small town, others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
- People Act Differently When They Wear Different Clothes. Do You Agree that Different Clothes can Change the Way People Behave? Use Specific Examples to Support Your Answer. 66
- The Benefits of Raising a Child in the City. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 252.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40873015873 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9005602147 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8918035969 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116256518787 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350395603012 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382101377498 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583976222532 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198468992571 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.