People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.
Visiting other nations and cultures is very rewarding. Traveling teaches us how to conduct life perfectly as well as how to expose to many groups of people. Moreover, traveling makes people more wisely and generously. I strongly disagree with the sentiment which states that national traveling is more advantageous than international traveling. I am against this idea for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Traveling is very important as visiting different countries can help us to build personalities of wisdom. Exploring the world educates us on how to be so understanding and open-minded. For example, people who are regularly traveling abroad are more subjected to a variety of cultures. As a result, this will expand individuals’ thinking immensely about other civilizations and will enable us to be more tolerated as well as to be integrated with many cultures. For instance, my father is habitually visiting other nations every single year, and because of this, he is truly open-minded and admirable for different cultures despite varying in the faiths and traditions to some extent. On the other hand, my uncle is stubborn and single-minded because he only prefers to swing locally. Hence, I believe that traveling is very important to our way of thinking.
Moreover, the voyage to other nations can teach us how to be human. To illustrate more, traveling to poor countries such as nations in Africa makes people completely grasper of the bitter truth that some people are suffering from such as starvation. For example, a well-known person from my country is famed for being truly adored for traveling. One time, he decided to go to Africa to start new experiences. Once he arrived there, he saw a lot of impoverished people who are fighting with hunger in order to survive. Consequently, he had decided to remain there in order to support them. Accordingly, he is one of the most influential people in supporting poor folks in Africa, and on this ground, many campaigns have been launched.
In summary, traveling abroad teaches us how to be considerate of different norms and traditions. Moreover, traveling exposes us to people who are underprivileged and, therefore, making us people of mercy.
- Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours. Moreover, they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a go 70
- Do you agree or disagree: “In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.”? 76
- TPO 15 80
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 71
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child`s development. What gift would you give to help a child develop? Why? Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ploring the world educates us on how to be so understanding and open-minded. For example, people wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18406593407 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04472334321 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510989010989 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8889300107 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8571428571 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222627759283 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718540346522 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804121724165 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148695607634 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248566899568 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.