There are different ways of learning to understand more about objects. A person can learn through reading a book, or might choose to practice an experiment. While on hand, others are just convinced of listening to be more knowledgeable. As a far as I am concerned, the practical part of doing the job by hand is the best way to memorize an experiment, and it is the best way to learn from mistakes
First, the practical part of doing an experiment is the best way to memorize it. If a student read about an experiment, he will be able to understand it. Students can take many courses at the universities However, those that do not have an experimental part would be the least to memorize. with practice people are more experienced and more qualified For instance, I studied pharmacy at the university Cairo, and there were many courses like pharmacology, pharmaceutics, and nuclear pharmacy. Those courses which did not have an experimental lab were the least I could memorize because on hand experiments provide people with experience and skills. Similarly, everybody know that adding a strong acid like hydrogen chloride to a strong base like sodium hydroxide would give a salt called sodium chloride.but, by doing the experiment in the lab, we can notice the formation of the salt which is formed as a result of this reaction.
Secondly, a person cannot learn from his her mistakes without doing the experiment. Some people claim that it is quiet satisfactory to read about a disease in the book. However, lots of people cannot understand the disease because they are not aware of the anatomy. For example, a doctors read about an anatomy from books,. However, without having a dead body and see the detail part of an organ and where it is located, he cannot perform an operation. Similarly, an electric engineer may connect a circuit with positive ans negative poles, but without knowing how it really works, he might have an electric shock.
Finally, using our all our senses may help more to understand about different things but may mot guarantee success. For instance, a student who preparing to get his driving licence might pass the oral exam. However, when he or she does the real driving exam, there is a possibility to fail. The oral exam may prepare us for the real behind the wheel test, but without practicing to drive the car on streets, there is no assurance that we can success.
In conclusion, from my personal experience, doing things by hand is the best way to learn from one's mistakes. It help me to memorize things in a better, thus I consider it the most important and trustworthy source of information,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...al part would be the least to memorize. with practice people are more experienced an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...doctors read about an anatomy from books,. However, without having a dead body and...
^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... electric engineer may connect a circuit with positive ans negative poles, but wi...
^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s by hand is the best way to learn from ones mistakes. It help me to memorize things...
^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...est way to learn from ones mistakes. It help me to memorize things in a better, thus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81718061674 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76120540231 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6472186151 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195312690699 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665495897505 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060635275108 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110998885355 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061094016633 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.