The article and the lecture are both discussing ways to prevent birds injury caused by the collision with glass buildings. The reading claims that there are three ways to prevent this collision from taking place. The professor dismisses all three claims and states that such solutions are useless and not effective.
First, the author posits that engineers can make glass non transparent so birds would see a solid object in front of them. The lecturer refuted this point by stating that replacing transparent glass with mirrors could cause birds to see reflected pictures of trees. He argues that birds cannot distinguish between reflected pictures and real pictures.This will not solve the problem and result ultimately in a collision.
Secondly, while painting the glass with colorful designs may help birds to identify that a solid object is in front of them, the unpainted holes inside these designs will still deceive birds thinking that it is free air. Besides, trying to reduce the size of holes within the design would cause darkness inside the rooms
Finally, the author claims that using a magnetic field that emit signals will direct birds away from the building. The professor again disagree with the author. He contends that magnetic field is effective to divert long distance travelling birds. However, short distance travelling birds will not recognize it because such birds use sight and day light to find there path.As a result, absolutely, collision would occur.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...event this collision from taking place. The professor dismisses all three claims an...
^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...en reflected pictures and real pictures.This will not solve the problem and result u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
... sight and day light to find there path.As a result, absolutely, collision would o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23849372385 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3929177203 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577405857741 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0088994292 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240858287472 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880805768041 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776930806792 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133751575531 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920173098696 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.