People learn easily from the friends beside them.
Friends have an important role in our life. They can help us to be successful, happy, and even sad. In my opinion, the fact that people learn from their friends who are beside them easily are not true. Here you can see my reasons.
Firstly, the modern technology change people’s attitude to their friends. Nowadays, people experience a huge advancement and improvement in different field of science and engineering such as smartphone, the internet etc. These new invention provide a suitable situation for the people to communicate with the professors, inventors, and the people who are experts in one field. So, people can learn from the people who have enough knowledge about the issue. In this situation, people prefer to just learn the professional and well informed people because they think that their friends are not eligible persons to learn from them.
Secondly, people do not have free time. Nowadays, by emerging economical criticism around the world, people have to start working early in the morning and continue their work until late at night to earn money for the clothes and foods. So, they do not have any free time to hang out with their friends and in most case, people eliminate their friends from their life completely. As a result, when people do not spend their time with their friends, there are not a strong mutual influence between them to cause people to learn from their friends easily.
On the other hand, some people think that people learn easily from their friends who are near them. Mostly, because individuals trust to their friends. The key factor of learning is being the trustworthy between the learner and instructor. So, it is clear that this claim is true. However, I do not agree with this idea. Although I believe that people trust to their friends, it cannot cause them to learn from their friends easily. In fact, most of us trust to their friends, but they do not like their personalities. Hence, we try to avoid from learning easily from our friends.
In conclusion, there are a lot of reasons to prove my claim that people do not learn easily from their friends who are beside them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Mohf89 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 73
- Tpo 9. Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past. Here you can see my reasons. 73
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
- TPO 5 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 67
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... as smartphone, the internet etc. These new invention provide a suitable situation for the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e professors, inventors, and the people who are experts in one field. So, people can le...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84972677596 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42902321558 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478142076503 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4279047563 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6818181818 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498115044913 0.236089414692 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175144615804 0.076458572812 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189956464365 0.0737576698707 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368633876308 0.150856017488 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948202614712 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.