People learn easily from the friends beside them.
Friends have an important role in our life. They can help us to be successful, happy, and even sad. In my opinion, the fact that people learn from their friends who are beside them easily is not true. Here you can see my reasons.
Firstly, the modern technology changes people’s attitude to their friends. Nowadays, people experience a huge advancement and improvement in the different field of science and engineering such as the smartphone, the internet etc. These new inventions provide a suitable situation for the people to communicate with the professors, inventors, and the people are experts in one field. So, people can learn easily and correctly from the well-informed and knowledgeable people that totally alters peoples’ view to their friends. Actually, now people think that the friends are not eligible to teach them and people learn from the easily.
In addition, there is no free time. Nowadays, by emerging economical criticism around the world, persons have to start working early in the morning and continue their work until late at night to earn money for the clothes and foods. So, they do not have any free time to do some extra activity like hanging out with their friends, and in most case, people must eliminate their friends from their life completely. As a result, when individuals do not spend their time with their friends, there is not a strong mutual influence between them to cause people to learn from their friends easily.
On the other hand, some people think that people learn easily from their friends who are near them. Mostly, because individuals trust to their friends. The key factors of learning is being trustworthy between the learner and instructor. So, it is clear that people learn easily from their friend who beside them. However, I do not agree with this idea. Although I believe that people trust to their friends, it cannot cause them to learn from their friends easily. In fact, most of us trust to their friends, but we do not like their personalities. Truly, we just are friends with them because we know that they do not have any negative effect on our life. Hence, we try to avoid from learning easily from our friends.
In conclusion, there are a lot of reasons to prove my claim that people do not learn easily from their friends who are beside them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Mohf89 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 71
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- TPO-5 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 73
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 61
- It is more important to keep old friends than It is to make new friends. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87373737374 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50298261016 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467171717172 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5676890111 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9130434783 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2173913043 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516812804741 0.236089414692 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197304438174 0.076458572812 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218083875287 0.0737576698707 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383838729392 0.150856017488 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127961643434 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.