People learn more by watching television than by reading books.
Nowadays, a television plays a prevailing role toward individual's life. It is what people need to be in touch with whatever happens in the world. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that people learn more by watching television than by reading books whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. I personally contend that watching television would be more effective than reading in individual's learning. The following reasons will aptly elucidate my perspective.
First and foremost, one can achieve the variety of information from TV by simply changing the channel besides it enjoys time. Furthermore, by emerging the satellite, people's accesses to the diverse program boost their knowledge and stabilize the position of televisions as an educational instrument Whereas, books always deliver limited information in a special subject which they talk about. For example, if one tends to have some information about how a building is constructed, he/she may face up huge volume of content which not all of them is necessary and is time-consuming for him. But by one program in TV he understands how a building is constructed.
The second reason which shapes my outlook is the convenience of getting information from TV than reading. In today's machinery world, people do not incline to get in trouble when they want to do something. So, they take less effort to learn materials by watching than reading because reading a book demands higher concentration. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own instance. When I want to learn material from my books, I need a quiet place to concentrate into the material and review my lesson more and more but if I learn the same matter from television, in the first look it becomes fixed.
To wrap it up, in watching television, people are dealing with feelings that have great influence on their mind and it makes information more stable than one wants to learn it by reading. Therefore, I conquer with this idea in which TVs are more influential than books in case of learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Mohf89 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 73
- schools should teach students about specific careers and jobs instead of general subjects 85
- People learn more by watching television than by reading books. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02623906706 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85965558575 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2027435492 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411579342973 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120363259442 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138815821501 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248863759288 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142917656174 0.0645574589148 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.