people now can live longer which of the following do you think is the main reason for this phenomenontechnological improvementimprove people dietimprovement in the education

Essay topics:

people now can live longer which of the following do you think is the main reason for this phenomenon

technological improvement

improve people diet

improvement in the education

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-16 Christine hanna 76 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...dition to that, this program could also reduces the amount of carbon dioxide in the air...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to continue to progress and develop.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36341463415 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00293431749 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4383152621 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.736842105 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237706576676 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076392826972 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713651140477 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145396911751 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045586355519 0.0645574589148 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.