Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that it is necessary when people are making an important decision get advice from some relevant people or an advisor. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that involving other people just increase uncertainty and difficulty for the person to make a decision and each person should make important decisions alone. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that a person should never make an important decision alone.
First and foremost, the decreasing effect of mental and psychological condition on our decision. Often at the time of making important decisions, people are not present in a completely normal and calm psychological condition, unless this important decision has a positive or negative effect on their life. For example, I had a very good grade on the entrance exam to admit universities and I was able to choose each of the universities I wanted. However, I was very excited about this success, and my decision about my future field of study surprised family and friends. I decided to study medical science because I had gotten its required grade, on the other hand, the study in biotechnology was my dream. During that time my mother helped me and recalled to me what was my real interest and prevent me from the wrong decision making based on emotional.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that different people looking to the issues with different angels and listen to their point of view led to more comprehensive and accurate decision making. In a reasonable decision making all of the positive and negative consequences should be considered. For example, last year my friend was searching for a house, its cost was the most important things to her. Therefore, she decided to get a house with three roommates that she did not know each of them. I and other her friends strongly disagree with her and tried to keep away her from doing this. Because we believed that living with people that she does not know, and in the neighbourhood that was not safe was not a true decision.
On the basis of reasons that was mentioned above, I am convinced that a person should never make an important decision alone. Because psychological condition has influenced on the ability of decision making. In addition, using other people point view in decision making always will have had a better result.
- TPO-45 63
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 73
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 89
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- TPO-53 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...making. In a reasonable decision making all of the positive and negative consequences shou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...never make an important decision alone. Because psychological condition has influenced ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94348894349 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70316502635 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496314496314 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6703195774 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426781319453 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146866006686 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193184785968 0.0737576698707 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32529459648 0.150856017488 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226704309465 0.0645574589148 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.